Posted on December 10th, 2008 by smoreland
Leave it to some straight-laced librarians to get together and change the name of our first Kansas Koha Users Group Summit to Koha Explorers Group, so we can call future meetings “keggers.” All joking aside, this summit/unconference went very well and ideas were flying among us with abandon.
We had a broad range of attendees from other library systems, individual libraries, community college libraries, and the State library (plus folks I’m leaving out…sorry). Some folks were brand new to Koha, like Robin from Ottawa Library and others were there to listen and learn before making a decision about switching to the Koha open source ILS. Jim was the master of ceremonies and started the day by inviting three library systems in the state who are implementing Koha to share their stories: Central, Southeast and us.
Kathy Rippel from Central Kansas Library System shared her experiences working with the Great Bend Public Library, the first of many libraries they plan to migrate from Athena to Koha. While they hit a few fine-related snags at the time of go-live, Kathy still complimented the system for its flexibility. From a patron’s point of view, the new ability to place holds from home was a big hit with the folks at Great Bend Public.
Mickey did a fantastic job (and I don’t say that just because he was up there instead of me) of explaining both our experiences migrating a shared catalog with unfettered sharing between libraries from Sirsi to Koha and some of the overall structures of Koha. He also spent time discussing how our relationship with LibLime, who hosts and supports our installations of Koha, has functioned and grown. We have worked to overcome some ‘growing pain’-related issues, for example by setting weekly or bi-weekly progress meetings with our project manager.
We did get into an interesting side discussion about how Koha seems to have a disconnect between the programmers who created the program and the librarians who have to use it. We think a lot of things need to be gone over by a librarian. The reports module and system preferences came up, specifically. Regardless of staff client problems, Mickey repeated the sentiment that as far as patron’s are concerned, it’s a very good system.
Roger Carswell and Joe Tholen shared details about how they’re managing the migration of 11 libraries, some automated, most not, to Koha. I was interested to hear how these different teams managed data mapping and cataloging fundamentals – how they used Item Types, Collection Codes and Shelving Locations. All three systems chose different solutions.
One of Roger’s libraries had to move their Holds shelving because they ran out of space – more proof that for patrons, Koha is a HIT.
Joe brought up a point that we struggled with in the beginning, what we call the “open source business model.” Open source works under a different relationship than the traditional vendor-client relationship. (Liz brought experience with this through WordPress and the KLOW project to our team.) As Joe said, “it’s a different mindset” and one that their libraries and they as the administrators have had to adjust to. SEK-n-Find, their shared catalog, is a new consortium of libraries and that has a different mindset as well. We were fortunate to skip that particular learning curve with our Phase One group who all came from the Kansas City Library Consortium environment. But training on ‘what it means to be part of a consortium where we ask you to share your materials with patrons from outside your taxing district’ is a challenge.
After lunch was the unconference portion of the day, where we suggested breakout topics and split up into groups. I facilitated the Reports discussion, which ended with the decision to bring in a MySQL trainer with Koha experience for collaborative state-wide training. How cool is that?? I’ll go into that more over at nexpresslibrary.org. I started upstairs at the Migration/System set-up session next, but moved down to the Circulation discussion. Shared our Firefox ‘hack’ that allows for automatic receipt printing. Also learned how Great Bend is using the Lists feature when cataloging new books to not only keep track of them for future maintenance, but also to facilitate placing holds in the staff client and searching for new books in the OPAC. This idea will be shared far and wide.
We ended the day back together to discuss future enhancements and future cooperation. It was quickly decided that the enhancements discussion would have to be a separate meeting, but that the desire to work together on sponsored programming was there.
A day well spent. Please comment. What did I leave out?
Sharon